Skip to main content Skip to navigation

IEC retreat dialogue

Institutional Effectiveness Council retreat dialogue notes 2.20.19

Q1. Assumptions (internal)
  • Must use resources efficiently
  • Challenges of student mental health
  • Tight budget constraints
  • Issues of academic freedom, inclusion
  • Too much is personality driven
  • President has decided to run a metric-driven university
  • Our change cannot be low; we must be faster to market
  • We have a system, and place matters
  • We have to enable people to do what they need to do
  • Opportunity for change management and accountability
  • Strategy drives structure
Q2. Assumptions (External)
  • More ethnically and economically diverse
  • More competition for students
  • Need for accountability
  • Higher ed has PR problem -people value but don’t see the value
  • Must keep up with technology
  • Federal funding declines
  • State funding declines (or not increases)
  • Declining recognition of higher ed value
  • Consumerism of higher ed
  • Can do more if do fewer things
  • Must have a tighter focus
Q3. Increased emphasis
  • Things that grow us
  • DT25
  • We are not good at identifying what we’re not good at
  • UGeducation major funding but lose $ on every engineering student
  • Need to see (and honor) $ brought in by NTT faculty
  • $62M brought in for research but only $32M in reimb costs
  • Need to harness power of the system
Q4. Continued importance
  • Need culture to support change
  • Culture eats strategy for lunch
  • Each unit has to contribute to DT25 but not to all areas
    • They must figure out what they contribute to
  • Criteria-based way to make decisions
    • Mission, goals; competition-wise; resources to do i.e. people, systems
    • Market share
    • Bottom line
Q5. Decreased emphasis
  • Need to develop process to assess, prioritize and resource programs
  • Move away from personality-driven decisions and constituent, advocacy-driven process and zero sum mentality
  • To knowledge, evidence-based data, core competency and strategy; transparent; collaborative; positive (not just taking away)
  • Investment orientation
Q6. How world will be better because of what WSU does
  • What do the values mean?
  • How do we live them?
  • DT25 needs the WHY
  • Kirk: reputation and value of degree
  • In-state requires 2 flagship Us
  • High tech economy provides opportunity
  • People are great; even if culture needs change
Beliefs and assumptions, important next steps

IEC steering is keepers of the process; conveners and interpreters

Next steps
  • Engaging the stakeholders
  • Design engagement strategies and calendar
  • Discuss Jean’s draft