Skip to main content Skip to navigation

Murrow College listening session feedback

Murrow College leadership dialogue notes 3.18.19

Assumptions
  • Transaction nature of students—can’t expect them to stay at one institution
  • Mobility in the culture
  • More reliance on online for rural and to accommodate mobility
  • More competition for students
  • More mental health needs
  • More disparities for access (e.g. eastern WA health disparities)
  • “Customer” mindset of students
  • Readiness of students – not sure where that is going
  • More need to partner for funding, grants
Mission
  • Obligation to teach the state
  • Obligation to eastern WA
  • Focus currently on hard sciences—needs to include arts, com, social science
Values
  • Family friendly environment
  • Accountability is overshadowing everything else
  • Transparency is a part of accountability
  • Athletic prowess seems to be highly values
  • Clash of values? E.g. Free expression, transparency, international
Drive to 25
  • Are winning big games
  • More research $ and support, better facilities for research and teaching
  • WSU fiscal support and infrastructure
  • No head butting—better research and teaching
  • Students access to better teaching, lifelong learners, better job placement, giving back
  • How do undergrads experience research?
  • Work outside classroom in tangible ways—why it matters
  • More creative spaces, elevate music
  • Research not isolated
  • “To be recognized” – by whom is unclear
  • “Students can’t decide which teacher was most impactful” bc so many will have been
  • Do we lose value of community?
  • Would improve recruitment and retention of faculty
  • Higher quality of life
  • Engaged students, leaders in communities and legislature
  • More access to information
  • Improved financial viability of the state
  • More perceived value of higher ed

Appreciation for the discussion—want more opportunities to consider these types of issues.